Woman or not woman, that is the question. In the UK, the new dilemma concerns precisely the female figure and who, by common opinion, has the right to identify with her or not, regardless of gender. As J.K. Rowling-backed protests continue in Scotland against the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, an ordinance that aims to radically make it easier for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate, i.e. a certificate certifying that their gender is “not the only one” . assigned to them at birth” without the need for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria, The Cambridge Dictionary strongly opposes radical feminism and updates the definition of a woman to include transgender people..
A woman is no longer just an adult female, unlike a man, but also “an adult who lives and identifies as a woman, even if it can be said that she has a different sex at birth.” The editors of the dictionary made the changes after reviewing the new uses of the word adopted by civil society and concluded that the new definition is appropriate for English learners.they should know”.
“It’s a good news. A lot of misinformation and rubbish has been thrown around the definitions of “male” and “female” lately, but these definitions are clear, concise and correct. Congratulations to the Cambridge Dictionary team!” Dr. Jane Hamlin, president of the Beaumont Society, a charity that supports transgender and non-binary people, told the Telegraph. Maya Forstater, executive director of the Sex Matters group, echoes her: “People have always used words in different ways and the vocabulary reflects this.. The main dictionary definition remains adult, woman and man. It’s also a legal definition, and it’s understandable to most people.”
For a level playing field The English Dictionary also updated the entry for “male”, is no longer identified only as an “adult male human being” and, more generally, as “the human race”, but also as “an adult who lives and identifies as a male, even if he can be said to belong to to the other sex. birth”. A sign that language follows the evolution of the speaker much more than some people would like. And it’s okay if the author of “Harry Potter” continues to claim that women are only “those who menstruate” – a paradoxical statement, given that there are people with amenorrhea, i.e. the lack of a menstrual cycle – in the end, as always, it will use to prevail. Always remember, as Italo Calvino said, that when you put up a wall, you must think about what you are missing.
Source: Elle