There are no civil rights acquired once and for all, and the path to progress lies not only forward. We have seen this clearly in the last few weeks when using a sponge United States Supreme Court destroyed decades of feminist struggle by abolishing Rowe vs. Wade which in 1972 sanctioned the right to abortion. And we continue to see this even now, as a federal court judge upheld a petition by conservative 20 state attorneys general who appealed Title IX, expanded Joe Biden in favor lgbt+ community.
The name of the measure refers to a federal civil rights law in the United States of America that prohibits gender discrimination in any school or any other educational program funded by the federal government. Well, within your program, in March 2021 President Joe Biden issued an executive order calling for the protection of queer people in educational settings., in accordance with the 2020 Supreme Court ruling in Bostock vs. Clayton County, which protected Lgtq+ workers from any form of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
“All students must be guaranteed an educational environment free from discrimination based on sex.including discrimination in the form of sexual harassment, which includes sexual assault and includes discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Joe Biden, who intended to repeal a Trump administration rule that offers more protection for those accused of sexual harassment and assault on college grounds. “For students attending schools and other educational institutions receiving federal financial assistance, this guarantee is encoded in part in Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments.” In short, a law that partially already existed, but which Biden also wanted to extend to the LGBTQ+ community in order to guarantee greater protection by allowing, for example, transgender students to play on sports teams and use the restrooms according to their gender identity.
Unfortunately, in August 2021, a panel of prosecutors challenged the measure, saying it threatened their states’ federal funding.. On Friday, July 15, U.S. District Judge Charles Etchley, Jr. of Tennessee ruled in favor of attorneys, blocking the overarching measure, arguing that the Title IX expansion “directly interferes with and threatens the ability of plaintiff states to continue to enforce their state’s laws.” “Currently, plaintiffs must choose between threatening legal consequences — enforcement actions, civil penalties, and denial of federal funding — or changing their state’s laws to enforce the guidelines and avoid such adverse actions.”
Shortly after the announcement of the news, LGBTQ+ community activists and organizations such as the Human Rights Campaign issued statements condemning the dangerous sentence. “We are disappointed and outraged by this decision by the Eastern District of Tennessee, in which the court blocked guidelines that say that the Supreme Court held in Bostock v. Clayton, namely that LGBTQ+ Americans are protected by existing civil rights laws. “, – said Joni Madison, acting president. Campaigns for human rights. “And nothing in this decision will take away the obligations of schools under Title IX or the ability of students or parents to file suit in federal court. The Human Rights Campaign will continue to fight these anti-transgender ordinances with all means to ensure its own.” It is hard to imagine that these homophobic and discriminatory attitudes can take on in the long term, one thing is certain: never relax, because tomorrow we may find ourselves without those rights that we thought were acquired once and for all. all.
Source: Elle