When Prince William was born in June 1982, it took Charles and Diana an entire week before sharing the name of their first child with the world, leaving royal fans on their toes. Apparently, a dispute arose: the two, at least according to the royal historian Robert Lacey, did not agree on the choice of name. In the end, Diana prevailed, but history repeated itself with her second son. Until now, if it was King Charles, his children would have had completely different names.
Second battle of brothers In Lacey’s new book, Charles and Diana had a long discussion about what names to give their princes. Mirrors States that if Charles could choose, today we would have Arthur and Albert instead of William and Harry. Yes, it may sound absurd: all names eventually become part of a person’s most intimate identity, but we often don’t even use surnames or titles to refer to the two principles, which made “William” and “Harry” even more identifying. . In accordance with Mirrors, Diana would have chosen the name “William” because it inspired power, possibly referring to William the Conqueror. Thus, the choice of Carlo was in second place. The full name of the heir to the throne is William Arthur Philip Louis. “Philip” is a tribute to Prince Philip, and “Louis” is a tribute to Lord Louis Mountbatten, one of Charles’ tutors (Crown document).
Also in Harry’s case, the name chosen by Charles was placed third after “Charles”, the prince’s middle name. Lady Diana got her way on both occasions, perhaps because after the birth her husband was unwilling to contradict her excessively. However, in Harry’s case, it was half the battle.. In fact, the name chosen by the princess was “Heinrich”, but no one, as far as we know, really uses it. In the royal family, all “Henries” are referred to simply as “Harry”.
Source: Elle