The names of Archie and Lilibet in the line of succession have recently appeared on the website of the royal family. Some say that it was Harry and Meghan who insisted, forcing their hand and for the first time naming their daughter the title of princess, which, however, rightfully belongs to her since the death of Elizabeth II. But after PWhy, if the children of Sussex are in every respect recognized among the heirs to the throne, they did not receive an invitation to the coronation of King Charles?
Harry and Meghan, after doubts and speculation related to tensions with the rest of the family, officially received an invitation to the ceremony on May 6th. It is not yet known if they will attend: “I can confirm that the Duke has recently received an email from Her Majesty’s Office regarding the coronation,” the spokesman said. Why not invite your children? As writes mirrors, “The correspondence from Buckingham Palace did not mention either Archie or Lilibet” and “the couple reportedly has no information on whether or not the children were involved in the ceremony.”
This content is imported from Instagram. You can find the same content in a different format or find more information on their website.
In accordance with daily mail, the non-invitation would be due solely to the age of the two princes, who are respectively three and a half and one and a half years old. Gossips, however, wonder if the same criterion would apply to William and Kate’s children. Prince George (age 9), Princess Charlotte (age 7) and Prince Louis (age 4) were invited.. Specifically, Louis is only 13 months older than Archie, but the choice of whether or not to let him participate in the coronation was left up to his parents. May 6, by the way, is also Prince Archie’s birthday and his parents are unlikely to want to leave him alone. Will this be another reason for controversy? We are awaiting a response from the Sussexes as May approaches.
Source: Elle