News about Baptism Lilibet Diana and this event caused quite a bit of surprise among the royal drug addicts, who always follow the Windsor saga with great interest, primarily because the representative of Sussex, reporting the good news, first mentioned the granddaughter of King Charles with the title of princess. A circumstance that has led many to believe that His Royal Highness’s treatment comes from baptism and that it is only through holy water that a little girl can finally boast of a title. In fact, the question is more complex and has nothing to do with the sacrament. Now we will try to explain why.
Prior to the arrival of Lilibeth Diana, it had never happened that a member of the English royal family was born in the United States, and this circumstance, not really relevant from a significant point of view, added uncertainty, at least for the public, to the problem of the use of royal titles by Harry’s heirs. and Megan. Parents’ mistakes shouldn’t fall on children, but there’s no doubt that the Sussexes’ renunciation of their role as working royals and the move to California helped complicate the problem, which the couple would usher in the rooftops with a cry of racism. The object of the dispute concerns the non-recognition of the status of prince and princess for the children of Archie and Lily at the time of birth., unlike what happened to George and then brothers Charlotte and Louis. A difference in treatment that Harry, but above all Meghan, could never accept to the extent that she spoke to Oprah Winfrey about a decision motivated by racist concerns.
In fact, the reason is related to the law in force since 1917 at the behest of King George V, which established by letters of patent that only the eldest son of the future king automatically becomes a prince at birth. Since Queen Elizabeth was still alive when her great-grandchildren were born, only George was entitled from birth to the title of His Royal Highness under this law. However, in order not to distinguish between the brothers, Elizabeth signed a document that provided for the same treatment of Charlotte and Louis, who in fact were always called princes. A different speech was made for Archie, who was born on May 6, 2019. The queen made no exceptions for the little one – Archie would become a prince only after the death of the sovereign and the accession to the throne of his grandfather Charles – however, she offered the child the honorary title of Lord Dumbarton, which the parents refused, fearing that their son could be teased by classmates because he was “stupid” in English means stupid.
With Elizabeth’s death, the Buckingham Palace website updated the titles of many members, starting with those of William, Kate and their children, who went from Dukes of Cambridge to Princes of Wales. With the ascension to the throne, Archie and Lilibet were supposed to automatically become prince and princess, lord and lady, but this did not happen, as the site still has the wording “Master and Miss” six months after the dynastic change. For their part, the Sussexes did not want to wait any longer and, after some delay, reported through their representative that Princess Lilibet Diana had been baptized on March 3 at their home in Montecito by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Reverend John Taylor. An event with a limited number of participants, only 20-30 people, to which the King, Queen Consort, William and Kate were invited, but none of them attended.
In fact, nothing happens that the king no longer knows about. Indeed, according to reports from Hello!, It seems that Charles and Harry agreed to use the title of Archie and Lilibet a month before Spare’s release. The controversial memoir, certainly unwelcome to the Windsors, must have contributed to the postponement of the decision to post the changes on the Buckingham Palace website, which has not yet been updated and which, in all likelihood, will change names “over time”, so after the sovereign’s coronation, the king wishes. However, the Sussexes did not want to be able to wait and once again, in continuous showdowns with London, they showed that they want to move independently, in full autonomy, the owners of titles and privileges that are bestowed only by the Crown and which the Crown can always be withdrawn.
Source: Elle