“Whatever the reason, my memory is my memory, it does what it can do, it collects and constructs facts as it sees fit and there is as much truth in what I remember and how I remember it as in so-called objective facts.”. Says, or rather writes, Prince Harry, who in these few lines from his memoirs Fire he defends himself in advance against charges of inconsistency that would have been brought against him the day after his television interview with good morning america and then when the book comes out. Tracing the reflections Elizabeth made at the time in response to accusations of racism – “memories can change” – Harry does not deny their fallacy, but at the same time strongly affirms the depository value of his memory, which he has witnessed for more than thirty-five years. years of life in the palace.
However, there are many unclear points and inconsistencies that do not add up and have led many royal observers to question the veracity of some of the claims.. Let’s start with the most thorny: containing accusation of racism. At the time of the interview with Oprah Winfrey, the statement had a strong impact on public opinion, which sided with the Sussexes. The couple never literally said that the Firm was racist, it wasn’t necessary, it was enough to raise doubt, speaking of their disgust at “anxiety and talk about how dark Archie’s skin could be when he was born”. A badly disguised accusation, but so strong that it made William himself retort: ”We are not a racist family at all.” Asked about this during an interview on Sunday, January 9th, However, Harry denied ever calling his family racist: “so said the British press”.instead talking about “unconscious bias” and adding “two things are different”.
But the inconsistencies don’t end there. After getting engaged in 2018, Meghan and Harry gave a joint interview in which they stated that they met in blind date through a mutual friend. In their Netflix documentary series, the couple revealed that they had a FaceTime video call before meeting at 76 Dean Street in Soho, London. But in his book, Harry only mentions brief messaging. The prince also recalls that she was wearing jeans, a black sweatshirt and high heels., “no frills” writes, the woman is “beautiful from a heart attack.” However, Meghan previously revealed that she was wearing a blue dress when they first met.
Another statement that does not converge concerns supposed private wedding three days before the Windsor wedding. Oprah Meghan said: “You know, three days before our wedding, we got married. No one knows. We called the Archbishop and just said, “Look, this is a show for the whole world, but we want to celebrate our union between So the vows we made in our room are just the two of us in the courtyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.” However, in his book, Harry clears up the misunderstanding by explaining that the ceremony in the garden was “informal, non-committal, except in our souls”. A kind of symbolic rite that has no religious or legal significance.
Back then, fans of the royal family expected that Fire contains some details on how his wife’s alleged mental illness and his request for help was not accepted within the family, instead the book makes no mention of it despite it being one of the hottest declarations of 2021. Then there is the thorny chapter regarding the relationship with his brother: in the documentary series, Harry refers to a meeting that took place at Sandringham between him and William in the presence of the Queen.
In this respect, he explains, older brother yelled at him. In the report Fire he only alludes to William’s complaints about the newspaper article and writes, “Willie was submissive. He wanted to listen. For the first time in a long time, my brother listened to me and I was so grateful.” If it is true, as Agatha Christie argued, that the three clues are the test, then here we have the beauty of six to raise at least some legitimate doubt about the nature of this reconstruction, certainly detailed but also full of inconsistencies.
Source: Elle