There is no place on the web where Harry’s new book, the first of an already announced trilogy, also consisting of a natural foods volume, which the Sussexes will write in the coming months. Rivers of words were spent everywhere on the prince’s searing revelations about his relationship with his sister-in-law Kate, his stepmother Camilla, his never-forgotten girlfriend Chelsea Davy, and his brother William. Anywhere but Buckingham Palace, where the proverb still lives Never complain, never explain. However, something leaked, at least from the body language and facial expressions of Kate, who the day after the publication of the memoir appeared in her car with a shocked face and a blue expression on her face. However, the press wasted no time and at the first opportunity tried to probe the reaction of the royal family..
While visiting first the Liverpool Hospital and then Wales at Birkenhead’s Open Doors charity to talk about mental health, a reporter asked William what he thought of Harry’s biography and as expected, the heir to the throne ignored the question before leaving with the ease that comes from the experience. In fact, for many years the royal family had to deal with Sussex arrows, and it cannot be ruled out that the statements contained in Fire was widely anticipated by Windsor’s entourage, so as not to be taken by surprise. It is the same with King Charles, who was greeted with enthusiasm by the crowd in Scotland, and appeared in good humour, when he stopped to joke with those present.
With this snapshot of sheer disinterest, Kate had one thing to say, and it was far from an innocent phrase that immediately fell under the media’s radar. When the couple visited a Liverpool charity that offers a creative therapy program for young people who are asked to express themselves through art and music, the princess admitted: “Today everyone talks so much about mental health” but “they say psychotherapy doesn’t work for everyone. It is very important to have a variety of possible treatments.” The suggestion didn’t seem random, and many saw it as a reference to Harry and his therapeutic journey, which Kate more or less wanted to hint at wasn’t supposed to have the desired effect, if that was the outcome. In addition to the appropriateness of addressing some topics that in some cases violate the privacy of the people mentioned in the book (from some details of the history with his ex to the life habits of his father), many wonder about the failure of some reconstructions, different from those suggested in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, but and in the series Harry and Megan. Summing up spareAccording to many, you still need to understand yourself.
Source: Elle